Quick synopsis:
An entertaining look at a fascinating mechanism of the human mind– rapid cognition– and how it works (and doesn’t work) in the real world. A must-read for anyone who has ever thought about how people think, pop-science afficionados, Malcolm Gladwell fans, and lovers of entertaining writing… in short, just about everyone.
Blink, by Malcolm Gladwell, is a fascinating look at the science of “rapid cognition”– those snap judgments that get right at the truth of the question or situation with seemingly no evidence or contemplation. Some examples that Gladwell gives:
- A tennis coach who can watch players toss the ball into the air and unerringly predict whether the serve will be fair or not
- An art historian who correctly intuits that a sculpture is a fake despite the same sculpture having been authenticated after months of study by museum experts
- A behavioral expert who watches 15 minutes of videotaped conversation between couples and predicts with 90% accuracy who will stay together and who will be divorced five years later
Deep in our subconscious is a cognitive machine that can be led astray by thinking too much or– as Gladwell convincingly shows– trying too hard to explain our choices. Impulse and instinct can be powerful tools, borne of our natural ability to “thin slice” and recognize patterns in our environment, events, and people based on remarkably thin slices of experience.
This isn’t a textbook or a scientific treatise, but an engaging account of thin slicing and pattern recognition as it happens in the real world, and high level overviews of fascinating experiments. A few more examples:
- Students are given 10 sentences to unscramble, believing that their verbal ability it being tested. Seeded in the word lists, but not part of the meaning of the completed sentences, are words that connote old age: Florida, gray, bingo, wrinkle. Students unscrambling the sentences walk out of the room more slowly than students unscrambling sentences without those words. They actually act old.
- Given far less resources, technology, and armament in a war simulation, a Marine Corps General playing the part of a rogue nation soundly defeats the American military apparatus by relying on intuition and instant decision-making.
But the pressure to discount our instincts and look before we leap and avoid judging a book by its cover aren’t to be wholly discounted. Thin-slicing can come at a distinct cost if the instant cognition we are counting on goes awry or is influenced by our environment. The Amadou Diallo shooting– a young black man shot 43 times as he tried to show his wallet– is an example of the tragic result of thin-slicing gone wrong with police officers, an occupation in which their very lives can rely on the thin-slicing but who are at the same time can’t help but be deluged with the kind of influences (images and situations) which are detrimental to successful thin-slicing.
Gladwell doesn’t shy away from this at all, but presents persuasive (and sometimes mind-boggling) studies showing how environmental cues warp our abilities:
- Simply being asked to identify their race on a standardized test resulted in a 50% decrease in test scores for blacks
- Warren Harding is elected president purely on the basis of appearing presidential
- Being short is as much of a handicap to achieving corporate success as being African American or female
Even trying to explain one’s choices can interfere. People asked to pick out photos they’ve seen for brief amounts of time before fail significantly more often if they are asked to first describe the pictures they have seen. The flash of insight that allows us to see faces and make quick decisions are surprisingly fragile, subject to being lost as they are passed from one hemisphere of our brain to the other. As Gladwell puts it:
“Insight is not a lightbulb that goes off inside our heads. It is a flickering candle that can easily be snuffed out.”
It seems clear from the research that these destructive forces can — to some degree– be countered in apparently obvious ways (sensitivity training, exposure to positive images) and our ability to thin-slice can likewise be improved with training. How much? What about people who are remarkably non-visual without being autistic? How do we know when to trust our gut and when to step back and use cautioned, reasoned analysis?
I don’t know and Gladwell doesn’t either. There’s no easy and no single answer. It took me a few days to realize that my disappointment at the end of the book was because of that fundamental irresolvability, not through any weakness in Gladwell’s writing. Blink isn’t a book that aims to provide a prescription for living… it isn’t “Rapid Cognition in 24 hours” but a witty and entertaining foray into the still largely unknown workings of the human brain.
http://www.oblios-cap.com/blosxom.cgi/976.writeback
Yeah, that’s right; we’ve skirted this topic before. Funny thing is, I’ve got some beefs with this Gladwell guy, and I’m gonna have to come clean about them. In his intro to “The Tipping Point” Gladwell bludgeons the reader with a classic cult-recruitment-mind-fuck using the word “yawn,” which, in Semantic Restructuring terms, is an ideo-sensory term (see http://www.semanticrestructuring.com/anthro_ideo.php). Well, guess what? This time he’s done it in his title. Which, by the by, I’ve seen in the stores and purposely not picked up because I was offended at this crass bit of left-over ‘80s Tony Robbins cerebral-fornication.
I am chagrined to find it’s a new Gladwell book, because “The Tipping Point” rocked my world, even if the most important parts had been waiting on my bookshelf in “The Dance of Life”, by Edward T. Hall, since about 1988. Oi.
Paradox: I’ll say in public why I’m annoyed with the man’s work; I’ll only share in private email the facet of his work I find most praiseworthy. But here’s a hint: Gladwell rocks in no small part because Dawkins sucks so very hard.
Well, I hope you’ll read blink and then point me to where he’s cribbing from so I can go and reada there too.
I haven’t read The Tipping Point (I ordered it), just some of the smaller essays that ultimately found themselves in the book…
I don’t know about the Tony Robbins connection. I think you’re reading too much into the title… he isn’t being metaphysical, he is referring to blink as in “blink and you’ll miss it” …
1.) Tony Robbins <> Metaphysical
2.) Gladwell doesn’t actually provide a biliography, but his endnotes serve the purpose well enough. To his credit, he presents ideas that made their way into the 80s pop-psych world, but does so from their academic roots.
3.) Had I not read the intro to “The Tipping Point” I might be able to agree that the title of the current book “just” means “don’t blink or you’ll miss it.” But given my prior experience with his work, and knowing how his work draws from the same resources (i.e. the work of Condon, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1175/is_v21/ai_5279353/pg_2 , which ties in to the work of Hall and Bateson) I continue to speculate about the vectors of cognitive infection to which Gladwell has been subjected.
4.) Speaking of vectors of cognitive infection and failures of the intellectual immunological system, did I mention that I got the buzz about this book from sources as disparate as Alaska and California within hours of each other? I think Gladwell himself would be amused.
5.) My skim of “Blink,” earlier today at a bookstore, leads me to think I can wait ‘til this is in paperback; when I’m in the mood I’ll stop by the store again and take note of the names of some of the journals he draws from and then read source material.
6.) I think my little sister has my copy of “Descarte’s Error,” to which I saw a couple of references in my skim of “Blink.”
Well, I got the Tipping Point. I still don’t see the connection between the term “blink” and Tony Robbins. Then again, all I know of Tony Robbins is that he is a bleached-tooth self-help guru that I’ve never taken very seriously, nor paid any real attention to outside of a couple of funny cameos where he has spoofed what I take to be himself.
Don’t see where The Tipping Point tips you off that Gladwell is passing off a Tony Robbins mind-fucking… I think your reading has been tainted, but I’ll wait until you’ve read the book and see if you still feel the same. He really is talking about the kind of cognition that happens in the split second of the blink of an eye, the single glance, etc. Perhaps the linguist protests too much?
Bateson too—I have to expose my ignorance. He’s the “double bind” (ahh, another idea, like the meme, probably completely perverted by particular domain usage, driving you crazy) guy, right?
I just lost a very long reply whilst trying to figure out your allowed tags. Grr.
Yes, Bateson is the guy who posited the double-bind theory of schizophrenia.
Gladwell’s use of the word “yawn” in the introduction to “The Tipping Point” and the word “blink” in the title of his new book are quite conisistent with the way Robbbins teaches sales folks to use ideo-sensory language. For more on ideo-sensory language see my article: Anthropomorphized Utilization of Ideo-Sensory Responses
There is a highly edutaining talk Gladwell gave shortly before the publication of ‘Blink’ at the Pop!Tech 2004 available at IT Conversations (http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail230.html).
Thanks for both of these—I’ll check them out. I’m still not sold on the Robbins connection, but we’ll see.
Beau: if you click the little ? link below the text box it will show you what’s allowed—basically, most Textile formatting is allowed, and that’s the easiest. Only a small subset of HTML will work…
Leave a Reply