I’m going to be a bad boy and link directly to Doc “the reluctant A-Lister” Searls recent post about gatekeepers from which those who are interested can read about the whole sordid saga… I just wanted to jot down a couple of personal thoughts for later:

  • You can’t have the value of the attention economy without necessarily recognizing– if not creating– gatekeepers and hierarchy
  • Links don’t necessarily subvert or create hierarchy– they are tools capable of both
  • Any conversation where “shifting” and “shifting fast” entails a discussion of blogs that move from within the Top 100 to the Top 200 and back again– out of <em>28 million+</em> blogs– needs to take a step back and think about the true size and scope of the discussion. Shifting from Top 100 to Top 10,000 would be significant! Top 100 to 200 is nowhere close to moving out of the A-List domain
  • It’s good to see reality taking hold and the realization that many sides of this discussion are right. There are gatekeepers; people who once felt slighted by them can find themselves in that role. Gatekeeping isn’t necessarily a positive or negative attribute, it just is. There’s a whole lot riding on some very slippery semantics here.
  • No one is forced to read the A-List, no one is forced to link to them. My blog is decidedly Q-list and it’s all about me, me, me… except when it isn’t. It doesn’t get referred to by the A-Listers, except when it does. And my definition of A-List is probably very different from yours– it includes Doc, but it also includes Alan, Brian, D’arcy, Doug, and another Brian, to name just a few– because it’s my choice and my construction… no one feeds it to me. In that respect, the web really is the wide-open space Doc says it is.

[, , , , ]